Funded by the NIH • Developed at the University of Washington, Seattle
|
Author:
|
Thomas D Bird, MD
|
|
Initial Posting:
|
Last Revision:
|
Disease characteristics. Alzheimer disease (AD) is characterized by dementia that typically begins with subtle and poorly recognized failure of memory and slowly becomes more severe and, eventually, incapacitating. Other common findings include confusion, poor judgment, language disturbance, agitation, withdrawal, and hallucinations. Occasionally, seizures, Parkinsonian features, increased muscle tone, myoclonus, incontinence, and mutism occur. Death usually results from general inanition, malnutrition, and pneumonia. The typical clinical duration of the disease is eight to ten years, with a range from one to 25 years. About 25% of all AD is familial (i.e., two or more persons in a family have AD) of which about 95% is late-onset (after age 60-65 years) and 5% is early-onset (before age 65 years).
Diagnosis/testing.
Establishing the diagnosis of Alzheimer disease relies upon clinical-neuropathologic assessment. Neuropathologic findings of
-amyloid plaques and intraneuronal neurofibrillary tangles remain the gold standard for diagnosis. The clinical diagnosis of AD, based on signs of slowly progressive dementia and findings of gross cerebral cortical atrophy on neuroimaging, is correct about 80%-90% of the time. The association of the
APOE e4 allele with
AD is significant; however,
APOE genotyping is neither fully specific nor sensitive. While
APOE
genotyping may have an adjunct role in the diagnosis of AD in symptomatic individuals, it appears to have no role at this time in predictive testing of asymptomatic individuals. Three forms of early-onset familial AD (EOFAD) caused by mutations in one of three genes
(APP,
PSEN1,
PSEN2) are recognized. Molecular genetic testing of the three genes is available in clinical laboratories.
Management. Treatment of manifestations: Treatment is supportive; each symptom is managed on an individual basis; assisted living arrangements or care in a nursing home is usually necessary; drugs that increase cholinergic activity by inhibiting acetylcholinesterase produce a modest but useful behavioral or cognitive benefit in a minority of affected individuals; tacrine, the first such drug, is also hepatotoxic; newer drugs with similar pharmacologic action [e.g., Aricept® (donepezil), Exelon® (rivastigmine), galantamine] are not hepatotoxic; antidepressant medication may improve associated depression.
Genetic counseling. Because AD is genetically heterogeneous, genetic counseling of persons with AD and their family members must be tailored to the information available for that family. It should be pointed out that AD is common and that the overall lifetime risk for any individual of developing dementia is approximately 10%-12%. Genetic counseling for people with non-familial AD and their family members must be empiric and relatively nonspecific. First-degree relatives of a simplex case of AD (i.e., single occurrence in a family) have a cumulative lifetime risk of developing AD of about 15%-30%, which is typically reported as a 20%-25% risk. This risk is about 2.5 times that of the background risk (~27% vs 10.4%). In contrast, early-onset familial Alzheimer disease (EOFAD) is inherited in an autosomal dominant manner.
The clinical manifestation of Alzheimer disease (AD) is dementia that typically begins with subtle and poorly recognized failure of memory and slowly becomes more severe and, eventually, incapacitating. Other common findings include confusion, poor judgment, language disturbance, agitation, withdrawal, and hallucinations. Occasionally, seizures, Parkinsonian features, increased muscle tone, myoclonus, incontinence, and mutism occur [Cummings et al 1998].
Death usually results from general inanition, malnutrition, and pneumonia. The typical clinical duration of the disease is eight to ten years, with a range of from one to 25 years.
Establishing the diagnosis of Alzheimer disease relies upon clinical-neuropathologic assessment [Cummings et al 1998]. Neuropathologic findings on autopsy examination remain the gold standard for diagnosis of AD. The clinical diagnosis of AD (prior to autopsy confirmation) is correct about 80%-90% of the time [Mayeux et al 1998].
Clinical signs: slowly progressive dementia
Neuroimaging: gross cerebral cortical atrophy [Kaye 1998]
Neuropathologic findings:
microscopic
-amyloid neuritic plaques, intraneuronal neurofibrillary tangles, and amyloid angiopathy at postmortem examination. The plaques should stain positively with
-amyloid antibodies and negative for prion antibodies, which are diagnostic of prion diseases
. The numbers of plaques and tangles must exceed those found in age-matched controls without dementia. Guidelines for the quantitative assessment of these changes exist [Braak & Braak 1991
, NIA-Reagan Working Group 1997]. Aggregation of alpha-synuclein in the form of Lewy bodies may also be found in neurons in the amygdala [Popescu et al 2004].
Differential diagnosis of Alzheimer disease includes other causes of dementia, especially treatable forms of cognitive decline, such as depression, chronic drug intoxication, chronic CNS infection, thyroid disease, vitamin deficiencies (especially B12 and thiamine), CNS angitis, and normal-pressure hydrocephalus [Bird & Miller 2004].
Other degenerative disorders associated with dementia, such as frontotemporal dementia including frontotemporal dementia with parkinsonism-17 (FTDP-17), Picks disease, Parkinson disease , diffuse Lewy body disease (LBD), Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease , and CADASIL , may also be confused with AD [Rogan & Lippa 2002].
CT and MRI are valuable for identifying some of these other causes of dementia, including neoplasms, normal-pressure hydrocephalus, and cerebral vascular disease.
AD is the most common cause of dementia in North America and Europe, with an estimate of four million affected individuals in the US.
The prevalence of AD increases with age.
The incidence of AD rises from 2.8 per 1,000 person years in the 65-69 year age group to 56.1 per 1,000 person years in the older than 90 year age group [Kukull et al 2002].
|
Cause
|
% of Cases
|
|---|---|
|
Chromosomal (Down syndrome)
|
<1%
|
|
Familial
|
~25%
|
|
Unknown (includes genetic/environment interactions)
|
~75%
|
About 1%-6% of all Alzheimer disease (AD) is early onset (before age 60-65 years) and about 60% of early-onset AD is familial, with 13% appearing to be inherited in an autosomal dominant manner [Rocca et al 1991 , Campion et al 1999].
The distinction between early-onset familial Alzheimer disease (onset before age 60-65 years) and late-onset familial Alzheimer disease (onset after age 60-65 years) is somewhat arbitrary. Note: Early-onset cases can occur in families with generally late-onset disease [Brickell et al 2006].
No environmental agents (e.g., head trauma, viruses, toxins) have been proven to be directly involved in the pathogenesis of AD. It is often speculated that late-onset AD is the result of unknown environmental factors acting on a predisposing genetic background [Borenstein et al 2006]. Twin studies have implicated both genes and environment [Gatz et al 2006].
Down syndrome (DS).
Essentially all persons with Down syndrome (trisomy 21) develop the neuropathologic hallmarks of AD after age 40 years. More than half of individuals with DS also show, if carefully observed or tested, clinical evidence of cognitive decline [Brugge et al 1994]. The presumed reason for this association is the lifelong over-expression of the
APP gene on chromosome 21 encoding the amyloid precursor protein and the resultant overproduction of
-amyloid in the brains of persons who are trisomic for this gene.
The amyloid-
(A
) deposition in the brain may begin in the first decade of life in persons with DS [Leverenz & Raskind 1998]. AD was not noted clinically or pathologically in a 78-year-old woman with partial trisomy 21 who did not have an extra copy of the
APP gene [Prasher et al 1998]. Two studies have found no association of Apo E genotype with age of onset of dementia in Down syndrome [Lai et al 1999
, Margallo-Lana et al 2004], but one study did find an association of onset age with a polymorphism in the
APP gene [Margallo-Lana et al 2004].
Schupf et al (2001) found an unexplained increased risk for AD in mothers who gave birth to children with DS prior to age 35 years.
About 25% of AD is familial (i.e., two or more family members have AD). Familial cases appear to have the same clinical and pathologic phenotypes as non-familial cases (i.e., an individual with AD and no known family history of AD) [Haupt et al 1992 , Nochlin et al 1993] and are thus distinguished only by family history or by molecular genetic testing. A large volume of research on the molecular and genetic basis of AD has been summarized by Rosenberg (2000), Sleegers & Van Duijn (2001), Nussbaum & Ellis (2003), Goedert & Spillantini (2006), and Roses & Saunders (2006).
Late-onset familial AD (AD2)
Molecular genetics. Investigations have supported the concept that late-onset AD is a complex disorder that may involve multiple susceptibility genes (reviewed and summarized by Kamboh 2004 , Bertram & Tanzi 2004 , Serretti et al 2005 , and Roses & Saunders 2006). Bertram et al (2007) have performed a meta-analysis on these data. The following information is currently available:
Well-documented association of late-onset familial AD (FAD) with the APOE e4 allele. The APOE e4 allele, by unknown mechanisms, appears to affect age of onset by shifting the onset toward an earlier age [Meyer et al 1998 , Khachaturian et al 2004].
Several other potential genes are under investigation:
Several other potential loci are under investigation on the following chromosomes:
Studies of LOAD in a genetically isolated Dutch population have suggested linkage of AD to markers on chromosome 1q22, 3q23, 10q22 and 11q25 [Liu et al 2007].
|
Chromosomal Locus
|
Protein Name
|
Test Availability
|
Genomic Databases
|
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AD2
|
APOE
|
19q13.2
|
Apolipoprotein E
|
Clinical features. Many families have multiple affected members, most or all of whom have onset of dementia after age 60 or 65 years. Disease duration is typically eight to ten years, but ranges from two to 25 years.
Early-onset familial AD (EOFAD)
Molecular genetics. At least three subtypes of EOFAD (AD1, AD3, AD4) have been identified based on the causative gene. The relative proportion of each subtype and the causative genes are summarized in Table 3 [Sherrington et al 1996 , Campion et al 1999 , Janssen et al 2003 , Raux et al 2005]. EOFAD and the molecular genetic testing available are described in more detail in Early-Onset Familial Alzheimer Disease . It is likely that other genes will be identified as a cause of EOFAD because kindreds with autosomal dominant FAD with no known mutations in PSEN1, PSEN2, or APP have been described [Cruts et al 1998 , Raux et al 2005].
|
Proportion of EOFAD
|
Chromosomal Locus
|
Protein Name
|
Test Availability
|
Genomic Databases
|
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AD3
|
20%-70%
|
PSEN1
|
14q24.3
|
Presenilin-1
|
||
|
AD1
|
10%-15%
|
APP
|
21q21
|
Amyloid beta A4 protein
|
||
|
AD4
|
Rare
|
PSEN2
|
1q31-q42
|
Presenilin-2
|
Clinical features. Early-onset familial AD refers to families in which multiple cases of AD occur with the mean age of onset usually before age 65 years, although some studies have used age 60 years or 70 years. Age of onset is usually in the 40s or early 50s, although onset in the 30s and early 60s has been reported. Campion et al (1999) found a prevalence of early-onset AD in the general population of 41.2 per 100,000 persons at risk (ages 40-59 years). Sixty-one percent of these individuals with early-onset AD had a positive family history and 13% met stringent criteria for autosomal dominant inheritance (i.e., affected individuals in three generations). EOFAD cannot be clinically distinguished from non-familial AD except on the basis of family history and age of onset. The dementia phenotype is similar to that of late-onset AD, sometimes with a long prodrome [Lampe et al 1994 , Godbolt et al 2004 , Larner & Doran 2006].
Individuals with non-familial AD meet the diagnostic criteria for AD and have a negative family history. Onset can be anytime in adulthood. The exact pathogenesis of the disease is unknown. A common hypothesis is that non-familial AD is multifactorial and results from a combination of aging, genetic predisposition, and exposure to one or more environmental agents, such as head trauma, viruses, and/or toxins [Cummings et al 1998] although no environmental agents have been proven to be directly involved in the pathogenesis of AD.
A three-generation family history with close attention to the history of individuals with dementia should be obtained. For each affected individual, the age of onset of dementia should be noted. Generally, individuals with onset before age 65 years are considered to have early-onset Alzheimer disease (AD) and those with onset after age 65 years are considered to have late-onset AD. Medical records of affected family members, including reports of neuroimaging studies and autopsy examinations, should be obtained.
GeneReviews designates a molecular genetic test as clinically available only if the test is listed in the GeneTests Laboratory Directory by either a US CLIA-licensed laboratory or a non-US clinical laboratory. GeneTests does not verify laboratory-submitted information or warrant any aspect of a laboratory's licensure or performance. Clinicians must communicate directly with the laboratories to verify information. —ED.
Late-onset familial AD. The association of one or two copies of the APOE allele e4 (i.e., genotypes e2/e4, e3/e4, e4/e4) with late-onset Alzheimer disease (AD) is well documented (Table 4) [Jarvik et al 1996 , Khachaturian et al 2004 , Martins et al 2005].
The association between APOE e4 and AD is greatest when the individual has a positive family history of dementia. The last column of Table 4 largely represents late-onset familial AD.
The strongest association between the APOE e4 allele and AD, relative to the normal control population, is with the e4/e4 genotype. That genotype occurs in about 1% of the normal control population and in nearly 19% of the familial AD population.
In individuals who have the clinical diagnosis of AD, the probability that AD is the correct diagnosis is increased to about 97% in the presence of the APOE e4/e4 genotype [Saunders et al 1996].
Note: The increased risk of AD associated with one APOE e4 allele or two APOE e4 alleles is also found in African-Americans [Green et al 2002] and Caribbean Hispanics [Romas et al 2002].
Approximately 42% of persons with AD do not have an APOE e4 allele. Thus, APOE genotyping is not specific for AD. The absence of an APOE e4 allele does not rule out the diagnosis of AD [Mayeux et al 1998].
Breitner et al (1999) have estimated lifetime risks for developing AD based on gender and APOE genotype. See Testing at-risk asymptomatic individuals under Genetic Counseling.
The usefulness of APOE genotyping in clinical diagnosis and risk assessment remains unclear [Statements and Policies Regarding Genetic Testing].
Although the presence of one APOE e4 allele or two APOE e4 alleles is neither necessary nor sufficient to establish a diagnosis of AD, APOE genotyping may have an adjunct role in the diagnosis of AD because a large proportion of individuals with one APOE e4 allele or two APOE e4 alleles who are demented have been found to have neuropathologic confirmation of AD at autopsy [Saunders et al 1996 , National Institute on Aging/Alzheimer's Association Working Group 1996 , Welsh-Bohmer et al 1997 , Mayeux et al 1998].
In contrast, APOE genotyping was not found to be of significant diagnostic use in identifying AD in a community-based sample with late-onset dementia [Tsuang et al 1999].
There is some evidence that the APOE e2 allele may have a protective effect in regard to risk for AD (Table 4).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Modified from Jarvik et al
(1996)
1. Most families would be considered to have late-onset familial AD. |
Another way to look at this association between AD and an APOE e4 allele is with APOE e4 allele frequencies (Table 5).
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Modified from Jarvik et al
(1996)
1. Most families would be considered to have late-onset familial AD. |
Early-onset familial Alzheimer disease. The three known subtypes of EOFAD, called AD3, AD1, and AD4 [Levy-Lahad & Bird 1996 , Tsuang et al 1999] can only be distinguished by molecular genetic testing (Table 3). (See Early-Onset Familial Alzheimer Disease for details about molecular genetic testing.) Genetic testing of individuals who are simplex cases (i.e., a single occurrence of early-onset AD in a family) is controversial and should be undertaken in the context of formal genetic counseling [Cammen et al 2004].
Genetic counseling is the process of providing individuals and families with information on the nature, inheritance, and implications of genetic disorders to help them make informed medical and personal decisions. The following section deals with genetic risk assessment and the use of family history and genetic testing to clarify genetic status for family members. This section is not meant to address all personal, cultural, or ethical issues that individuals may face or to substitute for consultation with a genetics professional. To find a genetics or prenatal diagnosis clinic, see the GeneTests Clinic Directory. —ED.
Because Alzheimer disease (AD) is genetically heterogeneous, genetic counseling of persons with AD and their family members must be tailored to the information available for that family. Early-onset familial Alzheimer disease is inherited in an autosomal dominant manner. AD is considered polygenic and multifactorial.
Genetic counseling for people with non-familial AD and their family members must be empiric and relatively nonspecific. It should be pointed out that AD is common and that the overall lifetime risk to any individual of developing dementia is approximately 10%-12%.
Parents, sibs, and offspring of a proband
Parents of a proband
Sibs of a proband
Offspring of a proband. Individuals with early-onset familial Alzheimer disease have a 50% chance of transmitting the mutant allele to each child.
Other family members of a proband. The risk to other family members depends upon the status of the proband's parents. If a parent is found to be affected, his or her family members are at risk.
Use of APOE genotyping for predictive testing. In contrast to the utility of APOE testing as an adjunct diagnostic test in individuals with dementia, there is general agreement that APOE testing should not be used for predictive testing for AD in asymptomatic persons. Data suggest that a young asymptomatic person with the APOE e4/e4 genotype may have an approximately 30% lifetime risk of developing AD [Breitner 1996]. Further refinement of this risk reveals that females with an APOE e4/e4 genotype have a 45% probability of developing AD by age 73 years, whereas males have a 25% risk [Breitner et al 1999]. These risks are lower — and the likely age of onset later — for persons with only one APOE e4 allele (peak age 87 years) or no APOE e4 allele (peak age 95 years). These estimates are not generally considered clinically useful; however, a research study to assess the potential utility of APOE testing in relatives of individuals with late-onset AD is under way [Green 2002 , Roberts et al 2005].
Down syndrome. Family members of persons with Down syndrome are not at increased risk for AD.
Testing of At-Risk Asymptomatic Family Members
Testing of at-risk asymptomatic adults. Testing of asymptomatic adults at risk for early-onset familial Alzheimer disease (EOFAD) caused by mutations in the PSEN1, PSEN2, or APP gene is available clinically. Testing results for at-risk asymptomatic adults can only be interpreted after an affected family member's disease-causing mutation has been identified. It should be remembered that testing of asymptomatic at-risk individuals with nonspecific or equivocal symptoms is predictive testing, not diagnostic testing.
Preliminary results have shown that while relatively few family members choose such testing, they usually cope well with the results, which can affect personal relationships and emotional well-being [Steinbart et al 2001]. However, significant depression following such testing has been reported [Quaid 2000].
Testing of at-risk individuals during childhood. Consensus holds that individuals at risk for adult-onset disorders should not have testing during childhood in the absence of symptoms. The principal arguments against testing asymptomatic individuals during childhood are that it removes their choice to know or not know this information, it raises the possibility of stigmatization within the family and in other social settings, and it could have serious educational and career implications. (See also the National Society of Genetic Counselors resolution on genetic testing of children and the American Society of Human Genetics and American College of Medical Genetics points to consider : ethical, legal, and psychosocial implications of genetic testing in children and adolescents.)
DNA banking. DNA Banking is the storage of DNA (typically been extracted from white blood cells) for possible future use. Because it is likely that testing methodology and our understanding of genes, mutations, and diseases will improve in the future, consideration should be given to banking DNA of affected individuals. DNA banking is particularly relevant in situations in which the sensitivity of currently available testing is less than 100%. See DNA Banking for a list of laboratories offering this service.
Prenatal diagnosis for pregnancies at increased risk for mutations in the presenilin 1 (PSEN1) gene is possible by analysis of DNA extracted from fetal cells obtained by amniocentesis usually performed at about 15-18 weeks' gestation or chorionic villus sampling (CVS) at about ten to 12 weeks' gestation. The disease-causing allele of an affected family member must be identified before prenatal testing can be performed.
Note: Gestational age is expressed as menstrual weeks calculated either from the first day of the last normal menstrual period or by ultrasound measurements.
No laboratories offering molecular genetic testing for prenatal diagnosis of EOFAD caused by
APP or
PSEN2 mutations are listed in the GeneTests Laboratory Directory. However, prenatal testing may be available for families in which the disease-causing mutation has been identified. For laboratories offering custom prenatal testing, see
.
Requests for prenatal diagnosis of adult-onset diseases are uncommon. Differences in perspective may exist among medical professionals and within families regarding the use of prenatal testing, particularly if the testing is being considered for the purpose of pregnancy termination. Although most centers would consider decisions about prenatal testing to be the choice of the parents, careful discussion of these issues is appropriate.
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD)
may be available for families in which the disease-causing mutation has been identified. For laboratories offering PGD, see
. Preimplantation diagnosis has been reported in a mother with an
APP mutation [Towner & Loewy 2002
, Verlinsky et al 2002].
The mainstay of treatment for Alzheimer disease (AD) is necessarily supportive and each symptom is managed on an individual basis. In general, affected individuals eventually require assisted living arrangements or care in a nursing home.
Although the exact biochemical basis of AD is not well understood, it is known that deficiencies of the brain cholinergic system and of other neurotransmitters are present. Drugs that increase cholinergic activity by inhibiting acetylcholinesterase produce a modest but useful behavioral or cognitive benefit in a minority of affected individuals. The first such drug was tacrine; however, this agent is also hepatotoxic. Newer such drugs with similar pharmacologic action, such as Aricept® (donepezil) [Feldman et al 2004 , Seltzer et al 2004 , Peterson et al 2005], Exelon® (rivastigmine) [Rogers & Friedhoff 1996], and galantamine [Raskind et al 2000 , Tariot et al 2000 , Mega et al 2005], are not hepatotoxic.
Memantine, an NMDA receptor antagonist, has shown some effectiveness in the treatment of moderate to severe AD [Reisberg et al 2003 , Tariot et al 2004].
Antidepressant medication may improve associated depression.
Treatment trials evaluating use of anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs), estrogens, nerve growth factors, ginkgo biloba, statins, BACE inhibitors, and antioxidants are under way or recently reviewed [Overshott et al 2005 , Klafki et al 2006 , Masters & Beyreuther 2006].
Search ClinicalTrials.gov for access to information on clinical studies for a wide range of diseases and conditions.
Vitamins and other over-the-counter medications have been used in the treatment of AD [Yaffe et al 2004].
Some, but not all, reports suggest that affected individuals taking HMG-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors for hypercholesteralemia have a reduced incidence of dementia [Wolozin et al 2000 , Li et al 2004].
Immunization of an AD mouse model with
-amyloid has attenuated the AD pathology and stimulated the search for a possible vaccination approach to the treatment of human AD [Schenk et al 1999]. A human trial of this approach was halted because of encephalitis in a few subjects [Check 2002
, Ferrer et al 2004].
Thus far, treatment of symptomatic AD with estrogens has not proven beneficial [Mulnard et al 2000 , Wang et al 2000].
Genetics clinics are a source of information for individuals and families regarding the natural history, treatment, mode of inheritance, and genetic risks to other family members as well as information about available consumer-oriented resources. See the GeneTests Clinic Directory.
Support groups have been established for individuals and families to provide information, support, and contact with other affected individuals. The Resources section may include disease-specific and/or umbrella support organizations.
GeneReviews provides information about selected national organizations and resources for the benefit of the reader. GeneReviews is not responsible for information provided by other organizations. -ED.
|