Funded by the NIH • Developed at the University of Washington, Seattle
[Wiedemann-Beckwith Syndrome]
|
Authors:
|
Cheryl Shuman, MS, CGC
Adam C Smith, MS Rosanna Weksberg, MD, PhD, FRCPC, FCCMG, FACMG |
|
Initial Posting:
|
Last Update:
|
Disease characteristics. Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) is a disorder of growth characterized by macrosomia (large body size), macroglossia, visceromegaly, embryonal tumors (e.g., Wilms tumor, hepatoblastoma, neuroblastoma, rhabdomyosarcoma), omphalocele, neonatal hypoglycemia, ear creases/pits, adrenocortical cytomegaly, and renal abnormalities (e.g., medullary dysplasia, nephrocalcinosis, medullary sponge kidney, and nephromegaly). Infants with BWS have an approximately 20% mortality rate, mainly caused by complications of prematurity. Macroglossia and macrosomia are generally present at birth but may have postnatal onset. Growth rate slows around seven to eight years of age. Hemihyperplasia may affect segmental regions of the body or selected organs and tissues.
Diagnosis/testing. The diagnosis of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome relies primarily on clinical findings. Cytogenetically detectable abnormalities involving 11p15 are found in 1% or less of cases. Clinically available molecular genetic testing can identify several different types of 11p15 abnormalities in individuals with BWS: (1) loss of methylation at DMR2 is observed in 50% of individuals; (2) gain of methylation at DMR1 is observed in 2% to 7%; (3) paternal uniparental disomy for chromosome 11p15 is observed in 10-20%. Testing reveals mutations in the CDKN1C gene (previously called p57 KIP2 ) in 40% of familial cases and 5-10% of simplex cases (individuals with no known family history of BWS).
Management. Management for BWS includes treatment of hypoglycemia to reduce the risk of central nervous system complications, abdominal wall and omphalocele repair in neonates, endotracheal intubation for insufficient airway, and use of specialized nipples or nasogastric tube feedings to manage feeding difficulties resulting from macroglossia. Children with enlarged tongues may benefit from surgery performed between two and four years of age and from speech therapy. Surgery may be performed during puberty to equalize different leg lengths; craniofacial surgery may benefit individuals with facial hemihyperplasia. Screening for embryonal tumors is performed by abdominal ultrasound examination every three months until eight years of age. Serum alpha fetoprotein (AFP) concentration is monitored in the first few years of life for early detection of hepatoblastoma. Neoplasias are treated using standard pediatric oncology protocols. Nephrocalcinosis is treated by a pediatric nephrologist.
Genetic counseling. Most individuals with BWS have normal chromosomes. In addition, approximately 85% of individuals with BWS have no family history of BWS; approximately 15% of individuals have a family history consistent with autosomal dominant transmission of BWS. Identification of the underlying genetic mechanism helps determine recurrence risk. Prenatal testing is available by ultrasound examination and maternal serum alpha fetoprotein assay. Prenatal testing is also available by chromosome analysis for families with an inherited chromosome abnormality or by molecular genetic testing for families with a defined molecular mechanism. Several studies have suggested an increased risk for imprinting disorders, including BWS, in children conceived using assisted reproductive technology (ART).
No consensus diagnostic criteria for BWS exist, although it is generally accepted that a diagnosis requires the presence of at least three findings (two major and one minor):
Major findings associated with BWS:
Minor findings associated with BWS:
Note: Children with milder phenotypes (e.g., macroglossia and umbilical hernia, or hemihyperplasia only) have developed tumors (see Management).
Cytogenetic testing. Chromosome analysis at a band level of at least 550 in 20 metaphases reveals a cytogenetically detectable translocation or inversion of a maternal chromosome 11 or a cytogenetically detectable duplication of a paternal chromosome 11 involving band 11p15 in 1% or fewer of individuals with BWS [Slavotinek et al 1997 , Li et al 1998].
Note: (1) Cytogenetic testing is necessary for correct interpretation of molecular genetic test results. (2) FISH testing may be used to clarify interpretation of cytogenetic test results when necessary.
GeneReviews designates a molecular genetic test as clinically available only if the test is listed in the GeneTests Laboratory Directory by either a US CLIA-licensed laboratory or a non-US clinical laboratory. GeneTests does not verify laboratory-submitted information or warrant any aspect of a laboratory's licensure or performance. Clinicians must communicate directly with the laboratories to verify information. —ED.
Genes. Beckwith-Weidemann syndrome is associated with abnormal transcription and regulation of genes in the imprinted domain on chromosome 11p15.5.
For key concepts of genomic imprinting, click here .
Molecular genetic testing: Clinical uses
Molecular genetic testing: Clinical methods
FISH. FISH studies can be used to clarify the position of a chromosome 11 translocation or inversion and to confirm duplications of chromosome 11. Only 1-2% of individuals with BWS have chromosomal abnormalities detectable by FISH.
Uniparental disomy (UPD) studies. Approximately 10-20% of individuals fulfilling diagnostic criteria for BWS have paternal UPD for the BWS critical region. Most demonstrate segmental paternal UPD for 11p15, suggesting that the underlying mechanism is a post-zygotic somatic recombination event resulting in mosaicism. Therefore, UPD may not be detected because of a low level of mosaicism in the tissue sampled. Testing of other tissues (e.g., skin fibroblasts, tumor biopsy) should be considered.
Note: If UPD is suspected based on analysis of the proband's sample, parental samples are required for confirmation.
Methylation studies
KCNQ1OT1 methylation (DMR2). Up to 60% of individuals fulfilling diagnostic criteria for BWS have detectable KCNQ1OT1 methylation abnormalities.
H19 methylation (DMR1). Between 2% and 7% of individuals fulfilling diagnostic criteria for BWS have gain of methylation at H19.
Note: (1) Individuals with UPD can be distinguished from individuals with abnormal methylation of either KCNQ10T1 or H19 because those with UPD have methylation abnormalities at both KCNQ1OT1 and H19. (2) Interpretation of methylation data should take into account results of karyotype analysis because karyotypic abnormalities are associated with abnormal methylation status.
Heritable microdeletions. Although most methylation defects at DMR1 and DMR2 are sporadic, a few families have been reported with microdeletions of DMR1 (Sparago et al 2004 , Prawitt et al 2005 ; three pedigrees) and of DMR2 (Niemetz et al 2004 ; one pedigree).
Note: (1) Currently no clinical testing for microdeletions of the BWS critical region is available. (2) Such rare pedigrees may be identified in the context of a positive family history with a methylation change at DMR1 or DMR2.
Mutation scanning. The majority of CDKN1C mutations found in BWS are located in exons 1 and 2 [Hatada et al 1996 , Hatada et al 1997 , Lee et al 1997 , O'Keefe et al 1997 , Lam et al 1999 , Algar et al 2000 , Li et al 2001]. Clinical testing for exon 1 and 2 mutations is available; testing for mutations in other exons and rare intronic splicing mutations [Lew et al 2004] may be done on a research basis.
Table 1
summarizes molecular genetic testing for this disorder.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
1. In individuals fulfilling clinical diagnostic criteria for BWS
2. False negatives may occur as a result of somatic mosaicism for UPD, which has been reported in all cases to date. Testing of tissue from a second source (e.g., fibroblast cells from a skin biopsy) may be helpful. 3. Bliek et al 2001 , Weksberg et al 2001 4. Lam et al 1999 , Li et al 2001 |
Interpretation of test results. For issues to consider in interpretation of sequence analysis results, click here.
Note: 1 and 2 can be performed simultaneously; however, if the proband has mental retardation, a karyotype should be performed first.
Molecular alterations at 11p15 including hypomethylation at DMR2, hypermethylation at DMR1 [Martin et al 2005], and 11p15 paternal uniparental disomy [Grundy et al 1991 , Shuman et al 2002] have been reported in individuals with hemihyperplasia.
Specific incidence figures for the individual clinical findings in BWS vary widely in published reports. The following features, however, are clearly part of the BWS phenotype.
Prenatal and perinatal. BWS is associated with perhaps as high as 50% incidence of polyhydramnios, premature birth, and fetal macrosomia [Elliot et al 1994]. Other common features include a long umbilical cord and an enlarged placenta, averaging almost twice the normal weight for gestational age [Weng, Moeschler et al 1995].
Infants with BWS have an approximately 20% mortality rate, mainly as a result of complications of prematurity associated with omphalocele, macroglossia, neonatal hypoglycemia, and, rarely, cardiomyopathy [Pettenati et al 1986].
Growth. Macroglossia and macrosomia are generally present at birth, though postnatal onset of both features has also been observed [Chitayat, Rothchild et al 1990 ; Weksberg, personal observation]. Although most individuals with BWS show rapid growth in early childhood, height typically remains at the upper range of normal. Growth rate usually appears to slow around seven to eight years of age.
Hemihyperplasia, if present, can generally be appreciated at birth, but may become more or less evident as the child grows. Hemihyperplasia may affect segmental regions of the body or selected organs and tissues. When several segments are involved, hemihyperplasia may be limited to one side of the body (ipsilateral) or involve opposite sides of the body (contralateral) [Viljoen et al 1984 , Hoyme et al 1998].
Note: Hemihyperplasia refers to an abnormality of cell proliferation leading to asymmetric overgrowth; in BWS, hemihyperplasia has replaced the term hemihypertrophy, which refers to increased cell size.
Metabolic abnormalities. Neonatal hypoglycemia is well documented [Engstrom et al 1988]; if undetected or untreated, it poses a significant risk for developmental sequelae. Most cases of hypoglycemia are mild and transient [Elliott & Maher 1994]; however, in more severe cases hypoglycemia can persist. Delayed onset of hypoglycemia (i.e., in the first month of life) is occasionally observed. Other less common endocrine/metabolic/hematologic findings include hypothyroidism, hyperlipidemia/hypercholesterolemia, and polycythemia.
Hypercalciuria can be found in children with BWS even in the absence of renal abnormalities as detected on ultrasound examination (22% in BWS as compared to 7-10% in the general population). [Goldman et al 2003] This may reflect an underlying primary structural abnormality in the kidneys.
Structural anomalies. Anterior abdominal wall defects, including omphalocele [Weng, Moeschler et al 1995 ; Pettenati et al 1986], umbilical hernia, and diastasis recti, are common. Much of the information regarding cardiovascular problems in BWS is anecdotal. Cardiomegaly is sometimes detected in infancy but typically resolves without treatment [Elliot & Maher 1994 , Pettenati et al 1986]. Cardiomyopathy has been reported but is rare.
Renal anomalies can include medullary dysplasia, duplicated collecting system, nephrocalcinosis, medullary sponge kidney, cystic changes, diverticula, and nephromegaly [Choyke et al 1998 , Borer et al 1999].
Neoplasia. Children with BWS have an increased risk of mortality associated with neoplasia, particularly Wilms tumor and hepatoblastoma, but also neuroblastoma, adrenocortical carcinoma, and rhabdomyosarcoma. Also seen are a wide variety of other tumors, both malignant and benign [Sotelo-Avila et al 1980 , Wiedemann 1983]. The estimated risk for tumor development in children with BWS is 7.5%. This increased risk for neoplasia seems to be concentrated in the first eight years of life. Tumor development is uncommon in affected individuals older than age eight years.
Development. Development is usually normal in children with BWS unless there is a chromosome abnormality [Waziri et al 1983 , Slavotinek et al 1997] or a history of hypoxia or significant, untreated hypoglycemia.
Adulthood. After childhood, complications for individuals with BWS are infrequent and prognosis is favorable.
Genotype-phenotype correlations have been reported as follows:
BWS was originally called EMG, based on the three clinical findings of exomphalos, macroglossia, and gigantism.
The reported incidence of approximately one in 13,700 [Thorburn et al 1970] is probably an underestimate given the existence of milder, undiagnosed cases. BWS has been reported in a wide variety of ethnic populations with an equal incidence in males and females [Pettenati et al 1986].
For current information on availability of genetic testing for disorders included in this section, see GeneTests Laboratory Directory. —ED.
Overgrowth. BWS is often considered in the differential diagnosis of children presenting with overgrowth. It is important to note that there are as-yet-unclassified overgrowth syndromes that need to be differentiated from BWS. In children considered to have BWS and developmental delay who have a normal chromosome study and no history of hypoxia or hypoglycemia, other causes for developmental delay need to be considered. If a cardiac conduction defect is present, the differential diagnosis should include both Simpson-Golabi-Behmel syndrome and Costello syndrome .
The following disorders should be included in the differential diagnosis:
Hemihyperplasia. Hemihyperplasia can occur as an isolated finding or may be associated with other syndromes such as Proteus syndrome, Klippel-Trenauny-Weber syndrome (KTW), and neurofibromatosis type 1 [Hoyme et al 1998]. Of note, a subgroup of individuals with apparently isolated hemihyperplasia may have BWS with minimal clinical findings. Asymmetries, such as of the face or chest, should be evaluated carefully to exclude plagiocephaly and chest wall deformities. Children with isolated hemihyperplasia carry an increased tumor risk of 5.9% [Hoyme et al 1998] and should be offered tumor surveillance.
Search ClinicalTrials.gov for access to information on clinical studies for a wide range of diseases and conditions.
Genetic counseling is the process of providing individuals and families with information on the nature, inheritance, and implications of genetic disorders to help them make informed medical and personal decisions. The following section deals with genetic risk assessment and the use of family history and genetic testing to clarify genetic status for family members. This section is not meant to address all personal, cultural, or ethical issues that individuals may face or to substitute for consultation with a genetics professional. To find a genetics or prenatal diagnosis clinic, see the GeneTests Clinic Directory. —ED.
The etiology of BWS is complex and not well understood [Li et al 1997 , Li et al 1998].
Parents of a proband
Sibs of a proband. The risk to the sibs of a child with BWS depends on the genetic basis for BWS in the proband (Table 2).
Approximately 85% of individuals with BWS have a negative family history and a normal karyotype. Of such individuals, four clinically relevant categories are identified:
Proband has KCNQ1OT1 hypomethylation (~50-60%). No recurrences of loss of methylation at KCNQ1OT1 have been reported in first-degree relatives of individuals with BWS who have this molecular lesion. Thus, the recurrence risk appears to be very low.
Proband has uniparental disomy (~10-20%). In families in which the proband has paternal uniparental disomy for chromosome 11p15, the recurrence risk is empirically very low because the UPD in this region appears to arise from a post-zygotic somatic recombination.
Proband has a CDKN1C mutation (~5-10%). When the family history is negative and a CDKN1C mutation has been identified in the proband, both parents should be tested for mutations. Several instances [Hatada et al 1996 , Hatada et al 1997 , O'Keefe et al 1997 , Lew et al 2004] of maternal transmission of CDKN1C mutations from clinically unaffected mothers to affected offspring have been reported, as well as two instances of paternal transmission from clinically unaffected fathers [Lee et al 1997 , Li et al 2001]. The recurrence risk for such parents may be as high as 50%. In addition, other at-risk family members should be offered testing for mutation in this gene to clarify their genetic status.
No identifiable primary etiology exists (13-15%). The risk to members in these families is unknown but empirically low. In cases in which loss of imprint for IGF2 in the absence of the above 11p15 molecular alterations has been identified as part of a research study, the basic underlying molecular defect is unknown [Weksberg et al 1993] and the risk of recurrence in the families is also unknown.
Approximately 10-15% of individuals with BWS have a positive family history and a normal karyotype. In such families two categories are identified:
Proband does not have an identified CDKN1C mutation (~60%). In this instance, the risk to sibs is up to 50%.
Offspring of a proband
KCNQ1OT1 hypomethylation. The recurrence risk for offspring of individuals with BWS caused by KCNQ1OT1 hypomethylation is low; empiric data are not yet available [Niemetz et al 2004].
Uniparental disomy. The risk to offspring of an individual with UPD for 11p15 is likely very low; however, empiric data are not yet available.
Identified CDKN1C mutation in proband. The risk to offspring of a female with a CDKN1C mutation is 50%. The risk to offspring of a male with a CDKN1C mutation is lower than 50%, but too few cases have been reported to generate a risk figure.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
1. 10-20% of individuals with BWS and no known family history of BWS have paternal uniparental disomy of 11p15.
2. 5-10% of all individuals with BWS with a normal karyotype have identifiable mutations in CDKN1C. |
Other family members of a proband. The risk to other family members depends upon the molecular etiology as noted above.
Parents of a proband. Parents of a proband with a structural balanced or unbalanced chromosome constitution are at risk of having balanced chromosome rearrangement and should be offered chromosome analysis.
Sibs of a proband with a chromosome abnormality.
Offspring of a proband with a chromosome abnormality. The risk may be as high as 50% if the proband is a female.
|
Cytogenetic Abnormality
|
Risk to Sibs of a Proband
|
Risk to Offspring
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cytogenetically detected maternal 11p15 translocation or
inversion
|
May be as high as 50% if the
transmitting parent is a female
|
May be as high as 50% if the
transmitting parent is a female
|
|
Cytogenetically detected paternal 11p15 duplication
|
Not defined
|
Not defined
|
Other family members of a proband. Whenever a chromosome abnormality is identified, other at-risk family members should be offered chromosome testing to clarify their status.
Family planning. The optimal time for determination of genetic risk and genetic counseling regarding prenatal testing is before pregnancy. Similarly, decisions about testing to determine the genetic status of at-risk asymptomatic family members are best made before pregnancy.
Possible imprinting risks associated with assisted reproductive technology (ART). Data have suggested the possibility of a link between assisted reproductive technology (ART) and imprinting disorders [DeBaun et al 2001 , Maher et al 2003]. More recently DeBaun et al (2003), Gicquel et al (2003), and Maher et al (2003) reported data suggesting that ART may favor