GeneReviews Funded by the NIH  •  Developed at the University of Washington, Seattle


Charcot-Marie-Tooth Hereditary Neuropathy Overview

[CMT]


Author:
Thomas D Bird, MD

Initial Posting:
28 September 1998

Last Update:
31 August 2007

 

Summary

Disease characteristics. Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) hereditary neuropathy refers to a group of disorders characterized by a chronic motor and sensory polyneuropathy. The affected individual typically has distal muscle weakness and atrophy often associated with mild to moderate sensory loss, depressed tendon reflexes, and high-arched feet.

Diagnosis/testing. The genetic neuropathies need to be distinguished from the many causes of acquired (non-genetic) neuropathies. Clinical diagnosis is based on family history and characteristic findings on physical examination, EMG/NCV testing, and occasionally sural nerve biopsy. At least 40 different genes/loci are associated with CMT. Molecular genetic testing is available on a clinical basis for some types of CMT.

Management.  Treatment of manifestations: management by a multidisciplinary team of neurologists, physiatrists, orthopedic surgeons, and physical and occupational therapists; special shoes and/or ankle/foot orthoses (AFOs) to correct foot drop and aid walking; gripping exercises for hand weakness; orthopedic surgery as needed for severe pes cavus deformity and hip dysplasia; acetaminophen or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents for musculoskeletal pain; tricyclic antidepressants, carbamazepine or gabafpentin for neuropathic pain. Prevention of secondary complications: daily heel cord stretching exercises. Agents/circumstances to avoid: drugs and medications such as vincristine, taxol, cisplatin, isoniazid, and nitrofurantoin that are known to cause nerve damage; obesity as it makes walking more difficult.

Genetic counseling. CMT hereditary neuropathy syndrome can be inherited in an autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive, or X-linked manner. Genetic counseling regarding risk to family members depends on accurate diagnosis, determination of the mode of  inheritance in each family, and results of molecular genetic testing. Prenatal  testing for pregnancies at increased risk is possible for some types of CMT if the disease-causing mutation(s) in the family is/are known.


Definition

Clinical Manifestations

Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) hereditary neuropathy (also called hereditary motor/sensory neuropathy [HMSN]) results from involvement of peripheral nerves that can affect the motor system and/or the sensory system. Individuals with CMT experience symmetric, slowly progressive distal motor neuropathy of the arms and legs usually beginning in the first to third decade and resulting in weakness and atrophy of the muscles in the feet and/or hands. Pes cavus foot deformity is common.

Although usually described as "painless," the neuropathy of CMT can be painful [Carter et al 1998].

Other findings can include hearing loss and hip dysplasia, which may be an under-recognized manifestation of CMT [McGann & Gurd 2002].

Establishing the Diagnosis of CMT

Progressive weakness of the distal muscles in the feet and/or hands is evident on medical history.

Individuals with typical CMT have high-arched feet, weak ankle dorsiflexion, thin distal muscles, depressed tendon reflexes, and distal sensory loss.

Electrophysiologic studies (electromyography [EMG] and nerve conduction velocity [NCV]), when carefully done, are almost always abnormal [Carter et al 2004 ; Pareyson, Scaioli et al 2006].

Sural nerve biopsy is not routinely performed, but is occasionally helpful in establishing the diagnosis of CMT hereditary neuropathy because relatively characteristic lesions are found in CMT1 , leprosy, vasculitis, and amyloid neuropathy [Schroder 2006].

Differential Diagnosis of CMT

Causes of acquired peripheral neuropathy include alcoholism, vitamin B12 deficiency, thyroid disease, diabetes mellitus, HIV infection, vasculitis, leprosy, neurosyphilis, amyloid deposition associated with chronic inflammation, occult neoplasm, heavy metal intoxication, and inflammatory and immune-mediated neuropathies such as chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP).

Blindness, seizures, dementia, and mental retardation are not part of the CMT hereditary neuropathy phenotype and suggest a different diagnosis.

Autosomal dominant disorders with neuropathy

Autosomal recessive disorders with neuropathy

X-linked recessive disorders with neuropathy

Hereditary ataxias with neuropathy.  Friedreich ataxia may present with sensory loss, depressed tendon reflexes, and high-arched feet.

Other hereditary ataxias sometimes have an associated peripheral neuropathy (see Ataxia Overview).

Hereditary motor neuropathies (HMN) are associated with distal weakness without sensory loss [Irobi et al 2004 , Auer-Grumbach et al 2005].

CMT syndrome with spasticity.  Some individuals with distal muscle atrophy and weakness may have signs of spasticity with brisk tendon reflexes and/or Babinski responses. This set of findings has been called HMSN V and sometimes overlaps with hereditary motor neuropathy (HMN).

One type is associated with mutations in BSCL2 (see BSCL2-Related Neurologic Disorders) and another with mutations in SPG20, the gene encoding spartin (see Troyer Syndrome .

See also Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia Overview .

Hereditary sensory neuropathies (HSN).  Several autosomal dominant axonal neuropathies have primarily sensory symptoms (one family is described as having "burning feet syndrome" [Stogbauer et al 1999]), and are classified as hereditary sensory neuropathies (HSNs) [Auer-Grumbach et al 2003]. Distal weakness may also occur.

Distal myopathies.  See Table 1 .

Table 1. Distal Myopathies
Name
Mean Age at Onset (Years)
Initial Muscle Group Involved
Inheritance
Welander distal myopathy
>40
Distal upper limbs (finger and wrist extensors)
Unknown
>35
Anterior compartment in legs
TTN
Markesbery-Griggs late-onset distal myopathy
>40
LDB3
Distal myotilinopathy
>40
Posterior > anterior in legs
MYOT
<20
Anterior compartment in legs and neck flexors
MYH7
Nonaka early-adult-onset distal myopathy
15-20
Anterior compartment in legs
GNE
Poterior compartment in legs
DYSF
Distal myopathy with vocal cord and pharyngeal signs (MPD2)
35-60
Asymmetric lower leg and hands, dysphonia
Unknown
Distal myopathy with pes cavus and areflexia
15-50
Anterior and posterior lower leg; dysphonia and dysphagia
New Finnish distal myopathy (MPD3)
>30
Hands or anterior lower leg

Mitochondrial disorders associated with peripheral neuropathy

See also Mitochondrial Disorders Overview .

Prevalence

Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) hereditary neuropathy is the most common genetic cause of neuropathy. Prevalence is about 1:3,300.

Approximately 20% of all individuals presenting to neuromuscular clinics with a chronic peripheral neuropathy have CMT1A.

Causes

Single-Gene Causes

The classification used in this GeneReview is based on inheritance patterns and molecular genetics (see Table 2). However, classification is especially difficult when different mutations in a single gene are associated with both autosomal dominant and autosomal recessive inheritance, and/or both axonal and demyelinating neuropathy.

Table 2. Single-Gene Causes of CMT Hereditary Neuropathy
Disease
Name  1
Pathology
Proportion of CMT
Abnormal myelin
AD
~50%
Axonopathy
AD
~20%-40%
Intermediate form
Combination of myelinopathy and axonopathy in individual
AD
Rare
Either myelinopathy or axonopathy
AR
Rare
Axonopathy with secondary myelin changes
XLD
~10%-20%
1. Each of the CMT subtypes — CMT1, CMT2, CMT4, and CMTX — is further subdivided primarily on molecular genetic findings [De Jonghe et al 1997 , Keller & Chance 1999 , Nelis et al 1999].

Vance (2000) suggested a similar classification system that differs slightly, with CMT3 referring to axonal presentations that are autosomal recessive and CMT4 referring to demyelinating presentations that are autosomal recessive.

Other valid classification systems may emphasize electrophysiologic characteristics such as nerve conduction velocities or pathologic findings.

The molecular genetics of CMT has been reviewed by Carter et al (2004), Kleopa & Scherer (2006), Houlden & Reilly (2006), and Nicholson (2006), and the molecular pathogenesis has been reviewed by Zuchner & Vance (2006) and Bernard et al (2006).

Charcot Marie Tooth Type 1 (CMT1) is a demyelinating peripheral neuropathy characterized by distal muscle weakness and atrophy, sensory loss, and slow nerve conduction velocity (typically 5-30 meters per second; normal: >40-45 m/s). It is usually slowly progressive and often associated with pes cavus foot deformity and bilateral foot drop. Affected individuals usually become symptomatic between ages five and 25 years. Fewer than 5% of individuals become wheelchair dependent. Life span is not shortened.

The six subtypes of CMT1 are clinically indistinguishable and are designated solely on molecular findings [Saifi et al 2003] (Table 3).

Table 3. CMT1: Molecular Genetics
Proportion of CMT1
Test Availability
CMT1A
70%-80%
PMP22
Peripheral myelin protein 22
Clinical
Testing
CMT1B
5%-10%
MPZ
Myelin P0 protein
Clinical
Testing
CMT1C
Unknown
LITAF
Lipopolysaccharide-induced tumor necrosis factor-alpha factor
Clinical
Testing
CMT1D
Unknown
EGR2
Early growth response protein 2
Clinical
Testing
CMT1E
Unknown
PMP22
Peripheral myelin protein 22
Clinical
Testing
CMT1F/2E
Unknown
NEFL
Neurofilament light polypeptide
Clinical
Testing

Charcot Marie Tooth Type 2 (CMT2) is an axonal (non-demyelinating) peripheral neuropathy characterized by distal muscle weakness and atrophy. Nerve conduction velocities are usually within the normal range; however, occasionally they fall in the low-normal or mildly abnormal range (35-48 m/s). Peripheral nerves are not enlarged or hypertrophic.

CMT2 shows extensive clinical overlap with CMT1; however, in general, individuals with CMT2 tend to be less disabled and have less sensory loss than individuals with CMT1. A threshold of 38 m/s for median motor nerve conduction is often used clinically to distinguish CMT1 from CMT2.

CMTX1 may present with a relatively axonal form of CMT that may be confused with CMT2.

The fifteen subtypes of CMT2 are similar clinically and are distinguished by molecular genetic findings (Table 4).

Table 4. CMT2: Molecular Genetics
Proportion of CMT2
Chromosomal Locus  1
Test Availability
CMT2A1
Unknown  2
KIF1B

Kinesin-like protein KIF1B
Clinical
Testing
CMT2A2
MFN2
Mitofusin-2
Clinical
Testing
CMT2B
RAB7

Ras-related protein Rab-7
Clinical
Testing
CMT2B1
LMNA

Lamin A/C
Clinical
Testing
CMT2B2
Unknown
19q13.3
Unknown
Research only
CMT2C
Unknown
12q23-q24
Unknown
CMT2D
GARS

Glycyl-tRNA synthetase
Clinical
Testing
NEFL
8p21
Neurofilament light polypeptide
Clinical
Testing
CMT2F
HSPB1

Heat-shock protein beta-1
Clinical
Testing
CMT2G
Unknown
12q12-q13
Unknown
Research only
CMT2H
Unknown
CMT2I
MPZ

Myelin P0 protein
Clinical
Testing
CMT2J
Clinical
Testing
CMT2K
GDAP1

Ganglioside-induced differentiation-associated protein-1
Clinical
Testing
CMT2L
HSPB8

Heat-shock protein beta-8
Clinical
Testing
1.  Chromosomal locus included only when gene is unknown
2. The frequencies of the various types of CMT2 are unknown and no single type is known to predominate [Timmerman et al 1996 , Saifi et al 2003].

Autosomal Dominant Intermediate CMT

Autosomal dominant intermediate CMT (DI-CMT) (Table 5) is characterized by a relatively typical CMT phenotype with clinical and pathologic evidence of both abnormal myelin and axonopathy. Nerve conduction velocities (NCVs) overlap those observed in CMT1 and CMT2 [Nicholson & Myers 2006]. Motor NCVs usually range between 25 and 50 m/sec.

Table 5. Autosomal Dominant Intermediate CMT: Molecular Genetics
Proportion of Intermediate CMT
Chromosomal Locus  1
Reference
Test Availability
DI-CMTA
Unknown
Unknown
10q24.1-q25.1
Unknown
Research only
DI-CMTB
DNM2

Dynamin 2
DI-CMTC
YARS

Tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase
1. Chromosomal locus included only when gene is unknown

Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 4 (CMT4) is a group of progressive motor and sensory axonal and demyelinating neuropathies. It is distinguished from other forms of CMT by autosomal recessive inheritance (see Table 6). Affected individuals have the typical CMT phenotype of distal muscle weakness and atrophy associated with sensory loss and, frequently, pes cavus foot deformity.

Note: The term Dejerine-Sottas syndrome (DSS) was originally described as a severe demyelinating neuropathy of infancy and childhood associated with very slow NCV, elevated CSF protein, marked clinical weakness, and hypertrophic nerves with onion bulb formation. Inheritance of DSS was assumed to be autosomal recessive. Subsequently, individuals with this clinical diagnosis have had various types of autosomal recessive CMT (CMT4) and have been heterozygous for point mutations in genes associated with CMT1 including: PMP22 (CMT1A), MPZ (CMT1B), and EGR2 (CMT1D) [Boerkoel, Takashima, Bacino et al 2001 ; Boerkoel, Takashima, Stankiewicz et al 2001].

Although the term DSS is still sometimes used to indicate a clinical phenotype, it does not imply an inheritance pattern or a specific genetic defect [Parman et al 2004].

Table 6. CMT 4: Molecular Genetics
Proportion of CMT4
Test Availability
CMT4A
Unknown
GDAP1
Ganglioside-induced differentiation-associated protein 1
Clinical
Testing
CMT4B1
MTMR2
Myotubularin-
related protein 2
Research only
CMT4B2
SBF2
Myotubularin-related protein 13
CMT4C
SH3TC2
SH3 domain and tetratricopeptide repeats-containing protein 2
CMT4D
NDRG1
Protein NDRG1
Clinical
Testing
CMT4E  1
EGR2
Early growth response protein 2
Clinical
Testing
CMT4F  1
PRX
Periaxin
Clinical
Testing
1. Tentative name

X-Linked CMT

Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy X type 1 (CMTX1) is characterized by a moderate to severe motor and sensory neuropathy in affected males and usually mild to no symptoms in carrier females. Sensorineural deafness and central nervous system symptoms also occur in some families (see Table 7).

Four other forms of hereditary neuropathy have been linked to the X chromosome. None of the genes has been identified. Associated findings are [Huttner et al 2006]:

Table 7. CMTX: Molecular Genetics
Disease Name
Proportion of X-Linked CMT
Chromosomal Locus  1
Test Availability
90%
GJB1

Gap junction beta-1 protein (connexin 32)
Clinical
Testing
CMTX2
Unknown

Xp22.2

Research only
CMTX3

Xq26

CMTX4/Cowchock syndrome

Xq24-q26.1

CMTX5

Xq21.3-q24

1. Chromosomal locus included only when gene is unknown

Evaluation Strategy

Establishing the specific cause of Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) hereditary neuropathy for a given individual involves a medical history, physical examination, neurologic examination, and nerve conduction and EMG testing, as well as a detailed family history and the use of molecular genetic testing when available.

Family history.  A three-generation family history with attention to other relatives with neurologic signs and symptoms should be obtained. Documentation of relevant findings in relatives can be accomplished either through direct examination of those individuals or through review of their medical records, including the results of molecular genetic testing and EMG and NCV studies.

Individuals with CMT may have a negative family history for many reasons, including mild subclinical expression in other family members, autosomal recessive inheritance, or a de novo (new) mutation for a dominant gene.

Physical examination.  In individuals who have no family history of neuropathy, the first step is to exclude acquired causes of neuropathy by standard neurologic evaluation (see Differential Diagnosis).

Distal weakness, sensory loss, depressed tendon reflexes, and foot deformity are commonly (but not always) present.

In CMT1, the most common CMT subtype, NCVs are very slow and peripheral nerves may be palpably enlarged. This is not true of CMT2 or CMTX.

Molecular genetic testing.  Molecular genetic testing is presently available on a clinical basis for mutations in numerous genes associated with similar phenotypes. (see Table 3 , Table 4 , Table 5 , Table 6 , Table 7). Note: Failure to identify a disease-causing mutation in a proband does not rule out a diagnosis of CMT since undetected mutations in other genes may be causative.

The following testing strategy may provide the most efficient and cost-effective approach to testing [Saifi et al 2003 , Klein & Dyck 2005 , Szigeti et al 2006]. However, it should be noted that some clinical laboratories may group tests into 'panels', which may be less expensive than sequential testing of individual genes if more than two or three genes are analyzed.

Positive family history

Negative family history